Updating Howard Becker’s Theory Of Using Marijuana For Pleasure

While Becker presented his social learning theory of marihuana use a long time ago, it has maintained its accuracy and is repeatedly applied to new topical areas. Most importantly, they propose a supplementary stage to Becker’s model that both precedes and permeates all the other stages. This additional stage, “learning to communicate and comprehend knowledge and interpretation”, relates to the distinctive aspects of online settings by emphasising written communication, modes of articulation, technological proficiency, and community norms and argot (Rosino & Linders, 2015, pp. 730–732). As Halbert and Kotarba also demonstrate, drug subcultures – described by Becker as occurring in a physical environment and in face-to-face encounters – can now also operate in virtual environments (see also Davey et al., 2012; Rosino & Linders, 2015; Soussan & Kjellgren, 2014). This also holds for polydrug use since, as in the case of a single substance , creating and enjoying drug combos includes social learning based on access to advice from experienced users.

After you’ve learned to inhale properly, learned to recognize how the substance will alter you, then the last step to becoming a marijuana user is to redefine potentially negative experiences as positive. As we talked about above, smoking marijuana can lead to anxiety, paranoia, insatiable food cravings, hyper sensitivity, confusion, etc. So the first step to becoming a pot smoker is learning to properly smoke pot. Most often this takes place when an experienced smoker socializes (i.e. trains) a novice smoker in the mechanics of the task.

The Internet has become a space for disseminating drug information wherein knowledge, practices and new innovations in polydrug use are also shared. In discussion forums, drug consumers meet “innovative users” (Boyer et al., 2007) who experiment with new combos and report their experiences to others. However, the discussion is not confined to celebrating the effects of good combos, it also includes a lot of risk talk (cf. Davey et al., 2012; Manning, 2014; Soussan & Kjellgren, 2014).

By allowing the re-writing of what we might consider pathological imprinting it eliminates the root of the problem and so if it takes, the cure tends to be permanent. One thing that vividly illustrates the stark differences between cigarette smoke and cannabis smoke is the state of section 5a1 osha act the interior walls of the residence of a heavy cannabis smoker vs. a heavy cigarette smoker . Well, in the case of cannabis it actually is a good thing because some of the compounds present in the smoke make it act as an expectorant( as opposed to making the smoker “gasp for air”).

Different societies have the same basic functional requirements, but they meet them using different configurations of social structure (i.e., different types of kinship system, economy, or religious practice). Thus, society is seen as a system not unlike the human body or an automobile engine. Sociology, as a social science, remains neutral on these types of moral questions.

2 Early studies found cannabis users to be average people who describe cannabis as a source of pleasure. The reported pleasurable effects include feeling happy, silly, euphoric, relaxed, hedonistic, sensual and foolish. 5 The most commonly reported negative effects of cannabis use are anxiety, panic and psychotic symptoms. The journal encourages advancements in the areas mentioned above in the form of research articles, reviews, commentaries, case studies and letters to the editors. The editorial Tracking system facilitates a user friendly article submission, review and publication.

Sophia Jennifer

Sophia Jennifer

I'm Sophia Jennifer from the United States working in social media marketing It is very graceful work and I'm very interested in this work.